Selling nano level consciousness and 2000 PPM silver water where 1,998 of
those PPM is "mind silver?" are entirely different animals when it comes to
proving fraud.

 Selling copper sculptures is one thing, selling copper sculptures with
magical properties for hundreds of times what they're worth without the
magical properties is another.

 Yes, I 'felt' Slim Spurings field, just as he suggested I should, when he
suggested I should.
 It would have been a lot more convincing had he turned it on without
telling us and  had  us each jot down when each of us thought it had happened.

 Perhaps his devices 'can' be "charged"..in the same way you can charge any
other object that you didn't buy.

 What Slim is selling is a belief...not that beliefs can't be very powerful.
 Paying a lot for a belief does make it more believable. In some cases
there may actually be some merit to that. But having merit doesn't change
the tactic behind the accomplishment.
 How much do you want to pay for your intentions? 
 Why is it that the intentions you already have are less powerful than the
ones paid dearly for?
 An economic investment is the same as an emotional one, both held valuable
by fear of loss and self image. 
 Every con man know this:  The harder ya screw em, the less likely they are
to feel the friction and complain about.
 Slap em in the face with their own vanity, desires and fears. They leave
smiling, you leave rich. [It's called ultimate salesmanship..buy nothing,
sell high.]
Ode

At 09:34 AM 4/20/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>Ode,
>Sounds like your mer-ka-ba is going the right way.  Important to check the
>spin on the CS too.  Intention or perhaps lack of attention can alter it.
>After a while one can just 'feel it'. I believe nano level has consciousness
>- it's just smaller but equally important to the whole.  Then it jumps up to
>being able to address unsolvable health issues locked in the quantum ...
>Kinda parallel to Slim's concepts... cleaning the air etc...
>Christine
>
>> From: Ode Coyote <odecoy...@alltel.net>
>> Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 05:52:41 -0400
>> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
>> Subject: Re: CS>Nano Silver lab analysis
>> Resent-From: silver-list@eskimo.com
>> Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 05:28:51 -0700
>> 
>> 
>> "Note: For any scientific body that wishes to verify these statements
>> about the parts per million or size of the silver particles in Nano Silver,
>> realize that almost all ordinary laboratory equipment that is used to
>> identify ingredients in substances will not work with nano-ized particles,
>> because they are so small. You must be able to "see" individual atoms or
>> extremely small molecules to detect the silver's presence, and most
>> equipment cannot do this. The strong silver presence in Nano Silver is
>> obvious to anyone who tastes it, but for mechanical systems, it's very
>> difficult to detect. That's why it works so well."
>> 
>> Frank, Drunvalo says you must be blind!
>> I'm sure he 'looked' at every single bottle to make sure it had the proper
>> amount of molecules.
>> Are you postive that your mercaba is spinning right?
>> 
>> Hmmm.. Slim Spurling is still around.  5000 practitioners?  I bet he's not
>> driving that old beat up truck anymore. [We've met]
>> 
>> Ode
>
>
>--
>The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>
>Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
>
>To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
>Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
>OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
>
>List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
>
>