CS>attn Mike Monett From: John Rigby Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:35:56 http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m73298.html
> Hi Mike, > Your Yahoo Box is kaput, so I've taken the liberty of posting it > here on CS: > A very lucid Site! > I would like to either host it on MATRIXIDE on Soapbox and/or > point to your Site here. > http://www.fablor.com/soapbox > http://matrixide.fablor.com > Cheers, > John Rigby > HIMAGAIN Hi John, Sorry for the delay in replying - I've been offline recently due to illness from mold toxins. Thanks for the nice comment and to JR for posting the link: http://geocities.com/mrmonett/shingles/0shin.htm I apologise for the bad email address. Unfortunately I cannot update the page and change it. My password stopped working when Yahoo bought Geocities a while back and they won't give me a new one. So that page is permanent:) Please let your readers know. Yes, of course you can mirror or link to the page whichever is your pleasure. Also, I should let you know I tried going to the urls you listed: http://www.fablor.com/soapbox gives "Warning: mysql_connect(): Access denied" http://matrixide.fablor.com/ gives "Could not locate remote server" For added information on shingles and cs, the "3 nines" version of cs described on that page eventually stopped working, and the shingles came back as a painful residual infection. This went on for about six months until I learned how to make the cs much stronger by drastically reducing the current density and by using the Faraday equations to calculate the brew time and ppm. Search the archives for "ULVDC", "Faraday", "Godzilla" and "Nernst" for more info if you are interested. Basically I ended up with something quite similar to Ken's Silverpuppy with a current density of 87uA/sq.in. instead of 625uA/sq.in. I have no problems reaching 22ppm with good dw, but it will give a pale straw color if I push it much past that. However, Sol mentioned that Ken has updated his web page with the following statement: "Colloidal Science Lab [Frank Key] AA spectrophotometer returned a "Plug n' Play" PPM of 11.29 at 85.7% ionic and I have no 'good' reason to doubt it." http://www.silverpuppy.com/page1b.html I think that measurement is in serious error and does not represent the actual performance of the Silverpuppy. Those numbers are more like a 3 nines on a very good day. Perhaps the sample was made with ordinary tap water, or some other error occurred. I think Ken and others have posted uS readings that indicate a much higher ppm. So something is wrong with that data, and the error should be located and corrected. Best Wishes Mike Monett -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
