Mike Monett wrote: > CS>FerroFluids > From: Matthew McCann > Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 19:26:08 > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m75123.html > > > The potency of the two species cannot be compared unless one knows > > the ppm of both. Even then, the surface area of the particulates > > may have a drastic effect on the outcome of the comparison - not > > to mention oligodynamism. > > Why not mention oligodynamism? It merely means a substance that is > much more lethal to bacteria than to humans, such as cs. There is > nothing magic about it. That's what silver ions do. > > The particulates in cs are silver oxide. See my analysis at > > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m75112.html > > Silver oxides are inert regardless of surface area. Check Frank > Key's site - he says the same thing.
You need to learn how science is done. When experimental evidence contradicts theory, the the theory is what must be discarded. As you well know silver oxide dissolves into water, and thus the particulate portion of EIS cannot be silver oxide. Why do you keep on insisting on this totally discredited theory? Now part of the ionic portion may be silver oxide, but there is no way that the particulate portion can be. So if the ionic portion is silver oxide and you claim that silver oxide has no effect on killing bacteria, why does ionic silver kill bacteria? Marshall Marshall -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
