Thanks, that helps. It is always nice to know that others have reached the same conclusion, or get some outside support for a theory.
Marshall alchemysa wrote: > > > I have often seen referencs to argyria and the 'the sun' in medical, and > other reports about argyria or siver toxicity. > Heres just one example from a google search on argyria/photographic. > > "In argyria, silver deposited in the body reacts with > the sun through a process similar to that of the development of a photographic > negative. This leads to permanent discoloration of the skin." > > http://www.rense.com/general12/blueasdf.htm > > David > > * From: Marshall Dudley (view other messages by this author) > * Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 07:08:32 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Ode Coyote wrote: > > > ## I don't recall any mention of using UV light one way or the other, but > > since agyria is well known to be a photographic process, I can't imagine > > that a frustrated researcher with an agenda wouldn't figure that out. > > Where else have you seen it? I have never seen argyria referred to as a > photographic process except by me in this group or papers I have written, and > others in this group. Do other researchers share this view? Do you have any > urls? > > Thanks, > > Marshall >
