When testing for TDS, ie mineral salts..both can be taken at face value in their own readout context as that is what they were 'designed' to do.
They weren't designed to test CS.
Ode
When 'drawing' a conclusion, you get an artists rendering of an answer.
A million people can agree and still be just as wrong as one that doesn't.
At 01:35 PM 5/10/2005 EDT, you wrote:
>>>>
In a message dated 5/10/05 4:10:24 AM Central Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:<<<<
A Hanna PWT reads out in microseimens of conductivity. [uS]
Hanna also make TDS meters that read out in PPM.
So -- to reiterate -- a Hanna PWT tester should be taken at face value -- no multiplying or dividing the numbers on the digital readout. A TDS meter would require multiplying the numbers shown. Have I got that right? MA
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 5/10/2005
--=======AVGMAIL-428202916E90======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-4BCF3AF7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 5/10/2005
