I know little about this topic, but I have read various interesting
related postings on this list, and in links provided here. These claim
that biopsy itself is very risky.
The point was that biopsy supposedly can spread cancerous cells. Once
the biopsy has been taken, according to this theory, the patient's
options have already been compromised; systemic chemotherapy is called
for.
The underlying idea is that the cancer's progress is at least somewhat
slowed down by the material that forms the lump that is subjected to
biopsy. IAW, the lump itself is a wall around the cancerous tissue.
I have no formal medical training and thus can't say whether this
information is or is not correct. However, it sounds plausible.
If I were helping someone to consider medical options, I would
certainly want to dig deeper.
I would also want to consider Omura's bi-digital o-ring test as a
possible non-invasive method of determining the status of the lump.
Alas, there are not many MDs trained in this method.
JBB
On Monday, Mar 6, 2006, at 03:51 Asia/Tokyo, [email protected]
wrote:
My concern for you, Wendy, is that breast cancers in younger women
often are notoriously more aggressive than those found in most post
menopausal patients. I hope you will go and find out for sure that
your lump is non-cancerous first, and THEN cast about for supplements,
treatments, massage, and other means to deal with it. Your lump
probably is non-cancerous -- the great majority of them are, but
finding out for sure is certainly a wonderful relief.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
