Because it is illogical to classify something as "waste" if it is
really perhaps merely "excess" for the moment.
Putting a negative label on something, especially something not
understood, doesn't make it so.
Research should clarify whether it's viable or not.
The practice has use across many cultures historically, so it seems
investigation instead of curt dismissal would be warranted.
Carlos explained many real uses, so that would answer the "why"
question.
Chuck
Dijon vu, the same mustard as before.
On 10/29/2006 5:17:49 PM, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> Well, it is difficult to go against documented benefits, but my
> wife's
> simple logic always seemed correct to me, namely, if it is a waste
> product that the body is getting rid of, how could it make sense to put
> it back?
>
> Del
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carlos Pérez" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 2:39 PM
> Subject: RE: CS>Secret health and longevity practices
>
>
> Dan,
>
> Practically all known civilizatios, during several thousand ye
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
