Thanks Dan,
For explaining this and for the longer post with all the details.
I do understand all this very well.
Long before I heard of the Faraday method, I made a post about
what I called a "Wattage Factor".
I stated briefly that this "Wattage Factor" used in the process
actually was a measure of the work being performed and nothing else
was as positive to tell what was happening or to compare processes.
At that time, I got not one comment from anyone.
Later someone did make a comment and agreed with me. It may have been
you or Ode.
There is a certain amount of logic in all this.
I think I have the stream velocity calculated but I want to double
check all my numbers before I post anything.
Or.... you could double check them for me. <grin>
Using the Faraday calculation and stream velocity, The amount of
water past a point in one second, appears to be the most, if not the
only true method of ppm calculation.
It appears that, within a short time, everyone will have the
continuous generator simplified so that many people may start doing
this for livestock and even for human use as well.
For a commercial system, it one was willing to spend 10 to 20 K, a
super reliable system could be built with full automation and monitoring.
Wayne
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
