> This was the first one I tried, but had an uneasy feeling that the > 100ppm it boasted wasn't right. I noticed then after I looked at > others that they were all 3ppm, 5ppm, and 10ppm seemed the highest, I > didn't even finish the Water Oz bottle but threw it away. I think a > degree of common sense has to be used in these circumstances. Dee
Yes and no, Dee. At the time Janis and Debbie (I think it was) turned up with argyria from it we knew quite a bit less than we do now. At least one of our members was an enthusiastic user of WaterOZ and happily recommending it to everyone. Until people here found out what was in it the only thing we knew was that there were positive user reports. Given the high concentration of WaterOZ (>100ppm), it was too easy for them to use more than the manufacturer recommended, especially when everybody else on the list was making and using low, 5 or 10 ppm concentration preparations by the pint and enthusiastically praising the results from *that.* Some is good, more is better? Afraid not! All we've ever been able to do is report the best of what we know or believe at the time. We've never held back, bad news or good. Be well, Mike D. [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [[email protected] ] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
