Hi,
> See if the /bin/sh is linked to bash
How can I follow the link? I mean how can find the target file?

My current question is now what is the message that shows the successful "make 
install". Is this output normal?
mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$ make install
make -s  -r FLEXUS_ROOT=`pwd` -f makefile.install install
mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$


// Naderan *Mahmood;




________________________________
From: mihai pricopi <[email protected]>
To: Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, April 18, 2010 10:35:55 AM
Subject: Re: skipping GLIBC runtime libraries

Hi Mahmood,

    I might be able to help you on this. Something similar happened to me too. 
See if the /bin/sh is linked to bash. In my case sh was linked to something 
else. I deleted that sh link and made a new one which was pointing correctly to 
bash. And then it worked.
Hope this helps.

Mihai


On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]> wrote:

Nice... I added "export SHELL=/bin/bash" to the beginning of themakefile.defs 
and that error vanished. I also tested this command in "makefile" and 
"makefile.checktsetup" but they didn't do the job.
> 
>After that, the ouput of "make install" is:
>mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$ make install
>make -s  -r FLEXUS_ROOT=`pwd` -f makefile.install install
>
>mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$ 
> 
>is it normal then? 
> 
>// Naderan *Mahmood;
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
 From: Jason Zebchuk <[email protected]>
>To: Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]>
>Cc: simflex <[email protected]>
>Sent: Sat, April 17, 2010 10:10:40 PM
>
>Subject: Re: skipping GLIBC runtime libraries
>
>
>You should be able to add it to either makefile.def or Makefile. Try Makefile 
>first and let us know which one works.
>
>To make it work with your version of gcc, changing required_gcc_version will 
>definitely be necessary. I don't know if anyone has tried simflex with that 
>version, so I'm not sure if it will work.
>
>Please keep us updated and let us know whether you have any more difficulties 
>or if it works fine with this change.
>
>
>Jason
>
>
>
>On
> 10-04-17 12:55 PM, Mahmood Naderan wrote: 
>
>mahm...@magma:serengeti$ /usr/bin/g++ -dumpversion 
>>4.4.1
>>mahm...@magma:serengeti$ /bin/sh --version
>>/bin/sh: Illegal option --
>>
>>>If it's not a version of BASH, you might be able to add the line "export 
>>>SHELL=/bin/bash" at the top of the >main makefile to fix your problem.
>>
>>You mean the makefile itself or makefile.defs? I also suspected to the the 
>>bash. Since my current shell is bash and as the error says, makefile seeks 
>>for sh. 
>> 
>>I also add "REQUIRED_GCC_VERSION_1=4.4.1" at the beginning of 
>>makefile.checksetup
>>
>> 
>>// Naderan *Mahmood;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
________________________________
 From: Jason Zebchuk <[email protected]>
>>To: Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]>
>>Cc: simflex <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Sat, April 17, 2010 6:23:10 PM
>>Subject: Re: skipping GLIBC runtime libraries
>>
>>Sorry, I forgot to ask the most important question. What happens
>> when you try to run:/usr/bin/g++ -dumpversion directly at the command prompt?
>>
>>While it does look like it's simply not finding the executable, there are two 
>>problems:
>>
>>First, the line "/bin/sh: [[: not found" shouldn't be there if g++ simply 
>>wasn't found, or wasn't executable.
>>Second,  the line "/usr/bin/g++ is not a valid executable." indicates that 
>>the GCC variable is actually set to the correct value.
>>
>>This is why I think it might be a problem with the shell.
>>
>>By default, make uses /bin/sh as the shell when executing commands, not 
>>/bin/bash. I believe the makefiles are expecting /bin/sh to actually be the 
>>same as /bin/bash, but this might not be the case.
>>
>>Can you check what "/bin/sh --version" is? If it's not a version of BASH, you 
>>might be able to add the line "export SHELL=/bin/bash" at the top of the main 
>>makefile to fix your
>> problem.
>>
>>
>>Jason
>>
>>
>>
>>On 10-04-17 2:59 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote: 
>>
>>mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$make --version
>>>>>>GNU Make 3.81
>>>Copyright (C) 2006  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>>This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
>>>There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
>>>PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>>>This program built for i486-pc-linux-gnu
>>>
>>>mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$bash --version
>>>>>>GNU bash, version 4.0.33(1)-release (i486-pc-linux-gnu)
>>>Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>>License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
>>>This is free software; you are free to change and redistribute it.
>>>There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>>>
>>>mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$make -n install
>>>>>>make -s  -r FLEXUS_ROOT=`pwd` -f makefile.install install
>>>if [[ -x /usr/bin/g++ ]] ; then \
>>>   GCC_VER=`/usr/bin/g++ -dumpversion` ; \
>>>   if [[ $GCC_VER == "4.4.1" || $GCC_VER == "" || $GCC_VER == "" ]] ; then \
>>>>>>     true ; \
>>>   else \
>>>     echo "/usr/bin/g++ reports its version as $GCC_VER." ; \
>>>     echo "Flexus only supports g++ 4.4.1 or  or ." ; \
>>>     echo "You can override this check and force make to continue by adding" 
>>> ;
>>> \
>>>     echo "GCC_VERSION_NOCHECK=true to makefile.defs" ; \
>>>     false ; \
>>>   fi \
>>> else \
>>>
>>>I have also attached the "make -d install". The problem is it can not find 
>>>my gcc or in another word, it doesnot accept /usr/bin/g++ as a compiler. I 
>>>noticed in the documents that Flexus is tested on Fedora and SUSE.
>>> 
>>>Does anybody install it on Ubuntu? Maybe the scripts are not compatible with 
>>>ubuntu.
>>> 
>>>// Naderan *Mahmood;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
________________________________
 From: Jason Zebchuk <[email protected]>
>>>To: Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]>
>>>Cc: [email protected]
>>>Sent: Sat, April 17, 2010 12:56:44 AM
>>>Subject: Re: skipping GLIBC runtime libraries
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm not quite sure what's happening. It looks like it's probably
>>> either a problem with the makefile syntax or bash syntax.
>>>If you could run the following commands, I might be able to figure out 
>>>what's happening:
>>>
>>>make --version
>>>sh --version
>>>
>>>make -n install
>>>make -d install
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 16/04/2010 1:56 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote: 
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>>Thanks for the info however I can not "make install". First the information 
>>>>about the compiler are:
>>>>mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$ pwd
>>>>/home/mahmood/flexus-3.0.0
>>>>mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$ locate
>>>> g++
>>>>/usr/bin/g++
>>>>/usr/bin/g++-4.4
>>>>/usr/bin/i486-linux-gnu-g++
>>>>/usr/bin/i486-linux-gnu-g++-4.4
>>>>/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/Platform/Windows-g++.cmake
>>>>/usr/share/doc/g++
>>>>/usr/share/doc/g++-4.4
>>>>/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/test-summaries/g++.sum.gz
>>>>>>>>/usr/share/man/man1/g++-4.4.1.gz
>>>>/usr/share/man/man1/g++.1.gz
>>>>/usr/share/man/man1/i486-linux-gnu-g++-4.4.1.gz
>>>>/usr/share/man/man1/i486-linux-gnu-g++.1.gz
>>>>/var/lib/dpkg/info/g++-4.4.list
>>>>/var/lib/dpkg/info/g++-4.4.md5sums
>>>>>>>>/var/lib/dpkg/info/g++.list
>>>>/var/lib/dpkg/info/g++.postinst
>>>>/var/lib/dpkg/info/g++.prerm
>>>> 
>>>>And the makefile.defs look like this:
>>>># GCC Compiler Settings
>>>>GCC_PATH=/usr
>>>>GCC_BINARY=g++
>>>> 
>>>>Now when I run "make install" I get this error:
>>>>mahm...@magma:flexus-3.0.0$ make install
>>>>make -s  -r FLEXUS_ROOT=`pwd` -f makefile.install install
>>>>/bin/sh: [[: not found
>>>>/usr/bin/g++ is not a valid executable.
>>>>You must set GCC_PATH in makefile.defs to point to g++ 4.1.0 installation 
>>>>path.
>>>>You must set GCC_BINARY in makefile.defs to the name of the GNU g++ 4.1.0 
>>>>binary
>>>>>>>>which should be located in GCC_PATH/bin
>>>>See Flexus quick start guide for instructions on configuring Flexus.
>>>>make[1]: *** [gcc_version] Error 1
>>>>make: *** [install] Error 2
>>>>
>>>>Really I don't understand what is "[[". 
>>>> 
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>// Naderan *Mahmood;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
________________________________
 From: Jason Zebchuk <[email protected]>
>>>>To: Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]>
>>>>Cc: [email protected]
>>>>Sent: Fri, April 16, 2010 12:15:40 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: skipping GLIBC runtime libraries
>>>>
>>>>Hi Mahmood,
>>>>
>>>>As the getting started guided discusses in the section on
>>>> "GLIBC Compatibility", Flexus requires a more recent version of GLIBC to 
>>>> run properly.
>>>>
>>>>The makefile provided with Flexus will check that the appropriate libraries 
>>>>are in place, and it's possible to remove those checks so that Flexus will 
>>>>compile without installing the glibc libraries. However, if you do this 
>>>>running Simics with Flexus loaded will result in unexplainable segmentation 
>>>>faults.
>>>>
>>>>The main problem is that Simics will try to load the GLIBC libraries from 
>>>>its x86-linux/sys/lib/ directory, and the libraries found there are 
>>>>incompatible with the compiler and linker used for Flexus. You can address 
>>>>this in two ways:
>>>>
>>>>1. Use make install to copy the correct libraries to that location, or 
>>>>manually copy the correct libraries to that location.
>>>>2. Remove the libraries from that location (being careful to keep backup 
>>>>copies someplace, e.g., in simics/x86-linux/sys/lib/bak/), and rely on a 
>>>>correct setting of LD_LIBRARY_PATH to make
>>>> sure Simics finds the correct GLIBC libraries.
>>>>
>>>>Depending on how GEMS was compiled doing this *shouldn't* affect GEMS. If 
>>>>GEMS and Flexus have to be compiled with different versions of gcc, then 
>>>>they might require incompatible versions of the GLIBC libraries. If this is 
>>>>the case, you *should* be able to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH when running Simics 
>>>>to ensure that the correct libraries are loaded depending on whether you 
>>>>plan to load GEMS or Flexus modules.
>>>>
>>>>Note that the makefile will ONLY affect the GLIBC libraries, it will not 
>>>>affect any of the other library files that might be associated with GEMS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hope this helps,
>>>>
>>>>Jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 15/04/2010 3:20 PM, Mahmood Naderan wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>>Is it possible to skip the section 4 of "Preparing the Build Environment" 
>>>>>in the getting started document?
>>>>>I have already used GEMS and want to know if I run that part, flexus 
>>>>>libraries replace the GEMS.
>>>>> 
>>>>>thanks,
>>>>>// Naderan *Mahmood;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



      

Reply via email to