Just thinking out loud ... Has anyone run SIMH through any form of static code analysis tool, and would it perhaps uncover some more previously-undetected bugs ?
In suggesting this, I realize that these static analysis tools often generate a lot of "noise" in their output too, but it might catch some of these issues that have escaped our eyes to date. Jason -----Original Message----- From: simh-boun...@trailing-edge.com [mailto:simh-boun...@trailing-edge.com] On Behalf Of Bob Supnik Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 4:10 PM To: simh@trailing-edge.com Subject: Re: [Simh] {Simh] A few more bugs found I'm only going to comment on my own code. 2. id_pas.c - this is real. The tests should be against TTUF_MODE_8B. Will be fixed in 3.9. 4. pdp1_cpu.c, Ea_ch. Also real, the & should be && in that statement. Will be fixed in 3.9. 6. pdp1_stddev.c, tto_svc. Also real. The code will be restructured so that c is only referenced inside the else {} statement. Will be fixed in 3.9 9. i1401_iq.c. Also real. The return should be commented out as well. Already fixed in the 3.9 code base. /Bob _______________________________________________ Simh mailing list Simh@trailing-edge.com http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh _______________________________________________ Simh mailing list Simh@trailing-edge.com http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
