I would have to concur. I have a physical 11/05. The 11/05 (same CPU as the 11/10) and it is nowhere near as capable as an 11/03. For a while there DEC had a tendency to release two new machines at a time. One would out perform the previous flagship processor, probably not costing too much more. The other would be comparable with the previous flagship processor but at a lower cost. The 11/05 was the similar capability lower cost follow on to the 11/20.

Comparing the 11/05 is slower than the 11/03 and lacking a bunch of useful instructions. The 11/05 is totally devoid of any memory management - 64K address space is all you get.

You could not configure 64K, of course because of the reserved address space. Mine has 32K, which I suppose is a typical large configuration. Core memory was expensive. I suppose one could have added a 16K board and had 48K but justifying the expense would have been difficult.

On 7/7/2012 3:14 AM, Göran Åhling wrote:
Well, I'd used the word "Weakest" to describe this aspect of a computer...

Without reading any PDP-11 architecture handbook (today), I'd like to claim the initial design, the 11/20, to have the weakest architecture within the PDP-11 family, it was released in 1970.

Just as all (almost) PDP:s the customer would order a CPU, and separately order as much or little of memory that was regarded "neccesary" for every task... 11/20 had a max. of 56 kB (28 kW), as the design has 16 bits of adressing (=64 kB), but 8 kB are reserved for I/O devices.

Exactely how little memory that would be enough to run an OS, Teco and an async port, I can't judge, but running an emulator, like SIMH, would alow for testing of this. The 11/20 was sold along with core memory, so a fair core memory card size for the minimum system would be elegant...

The instruction set of a PDP-11 was slightly extended with EIS for modells comming just a few years later, as several options (floating point support, commersial calculations support, memory management for 18 or 22 bits of address-space...)

But, as Johnny says, the LSI-11, aka PDP11-03, beeing the first LSI-design from DEC, released in 1975 with the new LSI-bus (aka Q-bus) is always remembered as the slowest PDP of all times, even though the architecture might be slightly improved over 11/20!

If you would like a running real physical system, the 11/03 would by far be the easier to get hold of, get running, and keep running. The 11/20 would typically need 2 pcs of 19" wide, 72" high racks... For emulation, this is however not an issue!

/Göran

On 2012-07-06 21:04, Richard wrote:
When I say "small", I'm referring to computational capacity, not
physical dimensions.


_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh





_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

Reply via email to