Johnny Billquist wrote:
> Well, MSCP was a good solution, and it's rather funny to now watch SATA
> and SAS, which is almost a carbon copy of MSCP and DSI, but 20 years later.
Unless I am mistaken, SCSI (at least in the form of SASI) preceded MSCP
chronologically and perhaps inspired the latter.
SAS thus would have no need for MSCP as an intellectual ancestor, although for
sure technologies of the same field, such as storage technologies, mutually
inform each other in the course of their development.
_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
