On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at 11:02 AM, gérard Calliet wrote: > VAX hardware 89 VUPS > > SIMH 27 VUPS > > Gérard Calliet
I suspect you may be using some generally available DCL procedure to report the simulated system's VUPS. That procedure may not map very well to the actual total system performance doing things other than somewhat tight loops in DCL on the system. A simulator in such a tight loop may easily have almost all of its activity hitting the host system's CPU cache while a more natural instruction mix (as in your Ada compiler activity) may be very different. The simh version you are running (commit 8810571d) is 4 years and 3 months old. Maybe you should pick up the latest from https://github.com/simh/simh/archive/master.zip Once you've got a recent version, you may want to try building both with and without ASYNCH_IO. The default IA64 builds with asynch I/O enabled. You can build without asynch I/O with the following command: $ MMK/MACRO=(NOASYNCH=1) vax Let us know what you find. - Mark > Le 06/03/2019 à 19:46, Hittner, David T [US] (MS) a écrit : > > So from a performance analysis perspective, what are the VUPS ratings of > > the VS4000-90 and the SIMH VAX running on the RX2800? > > That's (more or less) the Integer performance rating. > > > > David _______________________________________________ Simh mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
