Makes sense.  As more people start to use Exhibit and dig deeper into 
its functionality, I can easily see people wanting more control over the 
various components. 

Perhaps a way to address this is to allow facets/expressions/functions 
as input to Timeline band eventSources.  Each timeline band can display 
a subset of an existing Exhibit feed or as an individual Exhibit feed 
(since Exhibit can take multiple data feeds.)   Just something to think 
about.

- John

**************************************************
John Callahan
Geospatial Application Developer
Delaware Geological Survey, University of Delaware
227 Academy St, Newark DE 19716-7501
Tel: (302) 831-3584  
Email: [email protected]
http://www.dgs.udel.edu
**************************************************



David Huynh wrote:
> John Callahan wrote:
>   
>> This might sound crazy but are there any plans to standardize input formats 
>> between Timeline and Exhibit?   At least in json files/feeds?  
>> Or is this just calling for a Babel translation?
>>
>> Sorry if this has been brought up before.  It seems like an obvious question 
>> that may have some hidden non-trivial reasons why this is not 
>> possible.
>>   
>>     
> I think a Babel translation would be the way to go. We don't want to 
> dump down the Exhibit data model, nor complicate the Timeline data 
> format. David Karger has thought of this before but we haven't heard 
> enough users demanding it, so it takes lower priority than other tasks.
>
> David
>
>
> >
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SIMILE Widgets" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/simile-widgets?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to