[meant to send this to the list, not only Risto -- sorry for the dup,
Risto!]
On 10/18/2012 12:02 PM, Risto Vaarandi wrote:
> I am thinking about having a rule like
>
> type=Parse
> ptype=PerlFuncN
> pattern=sub { ... ; return %hash }
> varmap=event1
This sounds very cool, but is it really needed? Could you just not use
a Single rule with continue=takenext and action=none? The important
thing is to populate the varmap, right? But, if you think the syntactic
sugar is worth it, please go ahead! Or, would there be some issue I'm
not seeing with just using Single like that?
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark D. Nagel, CCIE #3177 <[email protected]>
Principal Consultant, Willing Minds LLC (http://www.willingminds.com)
cell: 949-279-5817, desk: 714-495-4001, fax: 714-646-8277
** For faster support response time, please
** email [email protected] or call 714-495-4000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Simple-evcorr-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users
