Hi Risto,

I appreciate your reply. Contexts are not something I have dealt with
much, but now that I see your example it makes a lot of sense now.

I have adjusted your sample rules to fit my environment and also
created another pair of rules for the linkUp traps as well. My testing
so far has been successful.

I also incorporated the context lifetimes at 12 hours per your
suggestion. I don't think it will pose a problem for us.

You have my thanks for creating SEC, it is a very useful tool!

Regards,

Steve Amren



On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Risto Vaarandi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> hi Steve,
> the task you are having can be attacked in several ways, both with
> SingleWith2Thresholds and EventGroup rule. After reading your mail, I had
> two different approaches in mind for those two rule types, but the one with
> SingleWith2Thresholds is probably simpler and easier to understand. This is
> probably because the problem description matches this rule type most
> closely, and if SingleWith2Thresholds would support the 'count' field as
> EventGroup does, setting up the solution would be straightforward.
> Fortunately, though, the missing functionality can be easily added by
> employing additional Single rule which is connected to the main rule with
> the help of a context. Here is the ruleset that should address the task:
>
> type=Single
> continue=TakeNext
> ptype=RegExp
> pattern=linkDown: device (\w+) interface (\w+)
> context=!LINKDOWN_DEVICE_$1_INTERFACE_$2
> desc=Device $1 interface $2 down
> action=write - %s
>
> type=SingleWith2Thresholds
> ptype=RegExp
> pattern=linkDown: device (\w+) interface (\w+)
> desc=Four linkDown events for device $1 interface $2
> action=create LINKDOWN_DEVICE_$1_INTERFACE_$2
> thresh=4
> window=600
> desc2=No linkDown events for device $1 interface $2 during 15 minutes
> action2=delete LINKDOWN_DEVICE_$1_INTERFACE_$2
> thresh2=0
> window2=900
>
> The Single rule that comes before SingleWith2Thresholds provides alerts for
> linkDown events, as long as LINKDOWN_DEVICE_ context does not exist for a
> given device and interface pair. Since this context is
> (1) created when four events have been seen in 10 minutes for the given
> device-interface pair, and
> (2) deleted when no events have been seen in 15 minutes for the given
> device-interface pair,
> it ensures we will get alerts for four linkDown events and the following
> ones will be ignored, until there is a 15 minute event-free time slot.
> To make things more bulletproof, a fixed lifetime might be introduced to
> LINKDOWN_EVENTS_ contexts, since otherwise they are only deleted by counting
> operations started with SIngleWith2Thresholds rule. If at some point SEC
> receives a signal which drops running operations from memory, some contexts
> might become orphaned and will exist forever. Having a lifetime of, say, 12
> or 24 hours will ensure that each context will eventually be dropped. Of
> course, this will recreate alerts for interfaces which see many linkDown
> alerts over long periods of time.
> hope this helps,
> risto
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Steve Amren <[email protected]>
>>
>> Greetings!
>>
>> I have been banging my head against the wall for a few weeks now
>> trying to figure out how to create a SEC rule (or set of rules) that
>> will alert on the first four occurrences of an event within a 10
>> minute period, suppress alerting for additional matching occurrences
>> and then resume normal alerting after no occurrences are seen for 15
>> minutes.
>>
>> Basically, I have SEC monitoring a log file which receives translated
>> SNMP traps which are output by an NMS application. These traps are
>> received from various network devices. The problem is that we often
>> receive huge numbers of duplicate traps. I am trying to put together a
>> rule or ruleset that can do the following:
>>
>> -Monitor a log file containing translated SNMP traps
>>
>> -Send an individual email notification for each of the first four
>> occurrences of a specific trap type (linkUp or linkDown), for the
>> specific device and interface name
>>
>> -After four occurrences within a 10 minute period, suppress further
>> email notifications until no matching traps are seen for 15 minutes,
>> then rest normal alerting status.
>>
>> I have been trying to find a way to make this work using the
>> SingleWith2Thresholds rule type but without much success. Perhaps the
>> EventGroup rule type would be more appropriate? In any case, I am not
>> making much progress.
>>
>> I've been studying the man pages, tutorials, and whatnot that are
>> available, which have been very helpful, and have successfully created
>> 13 rules to manage other traps, and so far those are working fine. But
>> I have not seen any examples that address a scenario quite like this.
>>
>> Perhaps there is even a better way to do this that I am not aware of.
>>
>> If anyone can provide me with some suggestions or assistance I would
>> greatly appreciate it!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve Amren
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
>> 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT
>> 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT
>> 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Simple-evcorr-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT
2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT
3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Simple-evcorr-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users

Reply via email to