...are there also other thoughts or propositions from list members how to
implement this idea?
regards, risto
2016-02-10 19:54 GMT+02:00 Risto Vaarandi <risto.vaara...@gmail.com>:
> hi David,
>
> when thinking quickly about it, it might be a better idea to provide time
> related data through action list variables. Currently there are already
> variables %t and %u which refer to current time in textual and numerical
> format, so action list variable approach would fit with an already existing
> scheme. Also, such approach would allow to access new variables not only
> from Calendar but all rules. The only downside of this is that these
> additional variables are set for every action invocation, but since actions
> are generally not triggered by thousands per each second, performance
> penalty might be minimal.
>
> The only question which remains open is the following -- since currently
> action list variables must start with a letter and can contain letters,
> numbers and underscores, introducing new reserved variables might clash
> with existing variables. One option to prevent this might be the use of _
> prefix for reserved action list variables (like %{_month} or %{_day}).
>
> kind regards,
> risto
>
> 2016-02-10 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Lang <da...@lang.hm>:
>
>> I have a case where I am using calendar events to summarize logs, with
>> each
>> summary ending up in it's own file due to the way I'm rotating the files.
>> Each
>> rotated file has the timestamp info in the filename.
>>
>> I want to change this to rotate less frequently, but to do this, I need
>> to add
>> the timestamp to each line in the file. I could import time and look it
>> up as
>> needed, but then I would run the risk of processing taking too long and
>> the
>> timestamp changing on me (and so not matching when the dump started)
>>
>> It occures to me that if we could have the values of time (which get
>> matched
>> with the time= line) put into the $1-$5 variables, it would make this more
>> reliable, and shouldn't hurt any existing configs, because they can't be
>> using
>> $<number>
>>
>> does this sound like a reasonable thing to do? and does it sound like an
>> easy
>> thing to do?
>>
>> David Lang
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
>> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
>> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
>> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
>> _______________________________________________
>> Simple-evcorr-users mailing list
>> Simple-evcorr-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Simple-evcorr-users mailing list
Simple-evcorr-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users
