Do I just give up on 3.4.1. then? By the way - was I right to remove 3.2.1. before trying to install 3.4.1. ?
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Scan Development Team, which is the registrant for Simple Scan. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891586 Title: resolution control: setting x/y resolution independently Status in Simple Scan: Triaged Bug description: Details in my Ubuntu Forum thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1648771 Quote: "Firstly - congratulations for Simple Scan, which lives up to its name admirably! Xsane is no doubt wonderfully competent, but far too complicated for casual use. But I am having a problem with Simple Scan, in that I can't seem to get selected resolutions to have any effect. A typical A4 mainly-text document I am playing with, ends up as: 165K when scanned & saved as text pdf at 75/150/300 or 600dpi... 1.5MB when scanned & saved as text jpg at 75-600dpi 2.2MB when scanned & saved as photo pdf or jpg at 75-600dpi. My Epson V200 scanner allows normal resolution selection with Xsane or with Epson's iscan application. Thanks for any suggestions!" - unquote. I started that thread in December 2010 & still have the same problem today. As a summary - the resolution control has absolutely no effect on the results. No error messages (unless I try 2400dpi) & nothing in simple-scan --debug >simple-scan.log I now have Simple Scan 2.32.0.1-0Ubuntu2 in Ubuntu 11.04. The scanner is an Epson Perfection V200 Photo & has normal resolution selection in XSane & Iscan. Thanks! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/891586/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~simple-scan-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~simple-scan-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
