Comment at end...al

In a message dated 6/3/2005 5:15:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Questioner: And what it is that we can do to break through this notion or illusion of time?

Bashar: Alright, thank you, now please do understand, you will not give up the illusion of time completely, in your transformation, not quite yet, but it can become very very much more flexible for you. It is good to break through the illusion of time, but at the same time recognize that it does serve a purpose, and you can learn to use the illusion in a different way as an illusion. The first thing to understand about the illusion of time is that it exists for the purpose of allowing you to have an experience of change. Without the experience of change, you would simply have change change change change change change from one thing to another with no intermediate experience of the change.



Now while it is a valid thing to be able to view all these different aspects of the infinite like that. The idea of the experience of change is also very important, because the experience of change is what puts you in touch with being a creator and gives you a sense of the act of creation, but by allowing you the illusion of time to become more flexible, then this experience of change and acts of creation can be experienced in a different way, a more accelerated way. Now you can use many different kinds of analogies to understand how there really is no time. We have often referred to things such as holographic pictures on your planet, or movie film t frames on your planet in order to illustrate the nature of how there is no time. There are now, just beginning on your planet, also, to be books written by your theoretical physicists who are also beginning to understand that there is no time. One such book on your planet that has just been created is called "The End Of Time". One thing therefore you could possibly do is to read that book, and it may help you develop a way of perceiving the universe from a timeless frame of reference. This can be understood through the sciences that you call Quantum mechanics and relativity.

etc etc etc......

.

==============
al:  Whether one views time as a sequence of segments or a collection of segments seen together, both of these represent separation. Thus it is understood that the appearances time presents by images (pluralities, segments) are not real, whether viewed sequentially or together. Reality is not a collection of parts, but is oneness infinitely being and sharing (which sharing IS its reality). Whatever is real, is real not only throughout eternity timelessly, but is also real everywhere always. One can differentiate by the language of separation, but those words cannot be true and faithful, for their very nature as separate words belies their purpose...and thus true purpose cannot be spoken by words. While we "are" individuals, we do not exist side by side, either in time or in space...but rather exist as a sharing of life and love. We use such phraseology as "timeless frame of reference" in order to attempt to portray that which cannot be portrayed, for portrayal itself is _expression_ of separation. That which is real needs no portrayal. It IS ITS OWN REPRESENTATIVE to all that it is...completely without symbols or mediaries. As soon as symbols are entertained, understand that to gaze upon symbols rather than reality itself, is what denial is. Quantum mechanics, physics, and science in general, and all forms of mathematics, are incapable of defining or describing reality, but can only define and describe the symbols alleged to be reality (or alleged to be an accurate and proper representation of it). Further, these (quantum, etc.) can only define and describe these symbols arbitrarily and inaccurately. The definitions are arbitrary, for unreal imagery is insanely without meaning, and the logic with which one would attempt to define is already couched in dead-end circles that lead nowhere, but which seem to lead somewhere until eventually they come full circle (which conclusion of their pathways often goes unnoticed, the earlier portions having already been forgotten). The definitions are inaccurate because there is nothing such as accuracy, but only "degrees of accuracy"...as pertains to science...and in reality, there is only one, and that "one" is infinite...whereas "accuracy" only applies to separation, in order to determine and measure that accuracy. By its own definition, accuracy is merely a word applied to agreements about degrees, levels, qualities and the like, all of which agreement parameters are arbitrarily decided, individually and collectively. - al



The inner light can answer any of this world's queries and resolve any of its problems.  Beyond all of these concerns, the inner light will show you who you are and your relationship to all...and bring you an understanding of love and peace that transcends ordinary human thought processes.  Discover what it truly means to "love one another" and to "see peace."



Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to