Hello, on 28.02.2002 17:35, Stefan Jeglinski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> This is in my router as of 12:00 PM today. >> >> <*[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = Null >> >> Tonight I get this email. It looks like it was caught by the router in the >> 1st line but seemed to continue to be delivered to the recipient, me. I do >> not have my address whiteholed. Even if I did, it seems that manual entries >> override the whitehole entry. I place the whitehole entries at the bottom of >> the router so they must pass the manual blacklist first. > > The router in this case operates on the return-path, not the From > address. Can you use "Null"? I use "ERROR".
Routing the return-path of an incoming message to NULL would not cause rejection of the message and will not affect the delivery. Routing to error will: the message will be rejected. -- Best regards, Dmitry Akindinov ======================================================================= When answering to letters sent to you by the tech.support staff, make sure the original message you have received is included into your reply. ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
