Steven,

This problem would be a lot easier to track if we could get the entire
bounce message, with headers.  I just tried (through Telnet) sending you
a message via a username with a trailing period through the primary MX
for that domain, and it seemed to work OK; let me know privately if you
received it.

Regards
Mark Hartman

At 12:06 PM -0400 4/12/02, Stefan Jeglinski wrote:
>This is not a SIMS question per se, but we have e-mail gurus here, 
>and so with nothing else to do on a Friday I humbly blather before 
>you :-)
>
>There is a person with a sympatico acct whose e-mail name is 'mary.' 
>(read "mary" "dot").
>
>When she e-mails me from 'mary.' to my SIMS account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
>everything is fine. When she e-mails me from 'mary.' to my 
>roadrunner address [EMAIL PROTECTED], she gets a bounce that 
>simply reports 'invalid user'. When she sends from a dotless address 
>('imary') to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it works fine. To further 
>confound the issue, sending from mary. to a user at san.rr.com 
>generates no bounce. To summarize:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]            no problem
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]     bounce
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]     no problem
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]       no problem
>all_other_e-mails  -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]     no problem (AFAICT)
>
>Obviously there's something going on with nc.rr.com and dot 
>usernames. I have an e-mail in to them, but I was wondering if any 
>gurus here had some insight to any potential problems with '.' in 
>usernames, as far as MTAs go. Is there any reason to filter and 
>bounce them, for example?

#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to