At 7:42 AM -0600 4/26/02, LuKreme imposed structure on a stream of electrons, yielding: >On Thursday, 25 April 2002 Bill Cole might have said: > >>At 1:26 PM -0600 4/25/02, LuKreme imposed structure on a >> stream of electrons, yielding: >>>At 12:12 4/25/2002 -0700 Dan MacDonald wrote: >>>>The argument that a well run, publicly available >>>> blacklist(s) is preferable to this system is compelling. >>> >>>Yes, but with the spammers taking legal action and, >>> absurdly, the courts siding with them, it makes the >>> whole RBL thing much more difficult. >> >>I'm not sure what you are talking about. There has never been >> a lawsuit over RBL-style blacklists which has been >> decided in a court. > >There have been lawsuits from spammers against ISPs that blocked their >spam. AOL, for one was sued and lost to a spammer.
Really?!? If you can find a citation, I'd really like to look into that. I know that AOL has had a lot of suits against spammers, but I wasn't aware of them losing any. -- Bill Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
