At 18:03 06.06.2002 -0400, you wrote: >But since the spammer is not likely to be bright (by definition),
At least they seem to be bright enough to use a good mail server, as shows the following excerpt from a spam which arrived here this morning: >Received: from ean.edu.co (ean.att.net.co [200.14.205.48]) > by mail.access.ch (8.10.2/8.10.2/INA-2.1mx1) with ESMTP id >g5734H705555 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 05:04:18 +0200 (MET DST) >Received: from [66.169.243.218] (HELO smtp0105.mail.yahoo.com) > by ean.edu.co (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2) > with SMTP id 1745403 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 06 Jun 2002 21:54:49 >-0500 > >*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) >Pro* Or - is it a bad sign for Communigate Pro that it is used by someone with an open relay? Christian. ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
