A client forwarded this to me: -----Original Message----- From: Mail Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the return address was refused. The return address was '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you feel this message to be in error. Reporting-MTA: dns; mailhost1-chcgil.ameritech.net Arrival-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:47:05 -0500 Received-From-MTA: dns; TRAVELER (67.39.172.238) Final-Recipient: RFC822; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: dns; grits.valdosta.edu (168.18.130.246) Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 We don't accept mail from spammers -----end Original Message----- The above is abbreviated but the important stuff is there. It's not clear to me whether mailhost1-chcgil.ameritech.net refused to accept it for delivery because it didn't like the return address or whether it got as far as grits.valdosta.edu, which suspects bzlaw.com of being a spammer. The presence of (seemingly) two error messages from two different MTAs has me scratching my noggin. Ameritech is the ISP for the office from which this was sent. And, no, bzlaw.com is not hosted, web or mail, on Ameritech's system. What's really going on here? -- "Your new computer's not gonna be a Mac? Dude, you're getting a Dull!" ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
