On 12/6/03 1:25 PM, Bill Cole at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From what I have been able to glean from people who seem to have seen > more detail than the press release, this really is as simple as it > sounds: a public key in DNS and a signature of the message (probably > including key headers) in a header, making it so that all mail using > this method would need to funnel through a mail server operated by > the domain owner of the return path domain.
Which seems to me is incompatible with a lot of the Port 25 blocking that goes on right now. For instance, if I'm travelling and using the internet connection at a hotel, I still want to be able to send using my regular address (yes, I know, return-path and From header are technically not the same but for most mail clients, they are). If I'm blocked from reaching my own mail server, then I can't send using the desired address. -- Larry Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stonejongleux.com/ ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
