Bill Cole at 2005-02-16 18:07 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:29 AM -0500 2/16/05, Timothy Binder imposed structure on a stream of electrons, yielding:On 2/16/05 8:00 AM, "Charles Mangin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i asked this before, but never got a reply. any advice or appropriate router entries would be appreciated:
i *think* i've set up my router to accept the required abuse and postmaster emails from blacklisted domains with lines like such (based on advice previously gleaned from this list):
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = abuse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = postmaster
Yes, this is the way to do it.
I don't think so, exactly. I believe that if you blacklist a *domain* (i.e. map it to 'error' in the router) there is no override. The above works to accept mail being offered from addresses on the IP blacklist or in a DNSBL.
The following works:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com = error
i.e. the whitelisted address has to appear before the blacklisted domain.
I may be misunderstanding the original question, but I think that's not what he was looking for...
That would allow you to handle mail to and from a single non-local address despite a domain-based blacklisting of the non-local domain part of that address.
I thought the question was about allowing exemption of a single local address from rules blacklisting a non-local domain, i.e. letting the local postmaster account exchange mail with any address in the otherwise blacklisted domain.
-- Bill Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[email protected]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
