[email protected] schrieb: > On Wed Dec 23 2:39 , Klaus Rudolph sent: > >> Petr Hluzín schrieb: >>> 2009/12/22 Knut Schwichtenberg [email protected]>: >>>> In one of my previous projects I used a 2^22Hz crystal. The >>>> frequency is 4.194304MHz. So, if there is an alternative input with >>>> floating point is implemented 1Hz as the last digit is necessary. >>> The discussion is about diagnostic _output_ in main(). Parsing users' >>> frequency input is not altered by my patches. >>> >> The original implementation has no idea of frequencies. It simply uses >> relative values for all the members of one simulation set. It makes no >> difference to use the values 4, 8, 12 or a set of 4000000, 8000000, >> 12000000. The unit is only in the users head, the values in the >> simulation are only relatives to the others. >> >> Using higher precision vars in the simulator only slows down the simulation. > > A good point for single-cpu simulations.
A single cpu simulation needs no frequency value. :-) _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
