>-----Original Message----- >From: simulavr-devel-bounces+anitha.boyapati=atmel....@nongnu.org >[mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+anitha.boyapati=atmel....@nongnu.org] On >Behalf Of Michael Hennebry >Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:11 PM >To: David Madden >Cc: simulavr-devel@nongnu.org >Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] ATmega644 > >On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, David Madden wrote: > >> On 02/21/2011 10:25 AM, Sebastian wrote: >>> are there plans to support ATmega644? >>> >>> Would that be just a matter of combining stuff from ATmega16/32 (which >>> are pin compatible) and ATmega328 (which has some (all?) new features, >>> like external interrupts, new timers, USART)? >> >> It looks like there's support for several chips in atmega668base, with >> individual chips choosing whatever peripherals are appropriate. That >looks >> like a good place to start. > >IIRC someone else did the heavy lifting to make an atmega168 and >I edited it to provide a base for the sequence atmega48/88/168/328. >They are alike except primarily for the sizes >of the memories and the vector tables. >They share a datasheet. >The 48 and 88 are small enough that they don't need >and don't have RJMP and RCALL instructions.
I hope this is just a typo for 'jmp' and 'call' instructions! Anitha _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
