WSWS :
War crimes tribunal drops charges against Croatian general
By Keith Lee and Paul Mitchell 26 February 2003
Use this version to print | Send this link by
email | Email the
author
The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
has dropped war crime charges against the former Chief of the Croatian
Army, General Janko Bobetko. Medical experts appointed by the tribunal
have declared the 83-year-old Bobetko too ill to stand trial.
Bobetko was the most recent of a number of top ranking Croatian
military officers to be accused of war crimes during the Homeland War.
This conflict erupted soon after Croatia declared independence from
Yugoslavia in June 1991 and the Serb majority in the Croatian Krajina
region responded by establishing an independent Serb Republic.
As the war escalated the United Nations sent peacekeeping troops into
the Krajina in February 1992. The following year Croatian Army units
attacked an area close to the UN patrolled area called the Medak Pocket.
Canadian UN troops reported how the Croatian Army laid waste to the area
killing unarmed Serb civilians.
In May 2001 the ICTY indicted General Rahim Ademi, commander of the
Medak Pocket troops, with unlawful killing of at least 38 Serb civilians
and the destruction of hundreds of buildings. Late in 2002 the ICTY
charged Bobetko with “command responsibility” for the attack.
In his autobiography All My Battles Bobetko boasts of his role
in the Medak Pocket as proof of his military ingenuity. The indictment
points, however, that the most intense killing and destruction took place
after a ceasefire had been agreed.
The ICTY has also charged another Croatian general, Ante Gotovina, with
“command responsibility” for war crimes committed during the August 1995
Croatian offensive code-named Operation Oluja (Storm) which
recaptured the Krajina and led to the biggest single act of ethnic
cleansing in the Yugoslav civil war. Between 150,000-200,000 Krajina Serbs
were displaced, about 150 murdered and hundreds more disappeared.
The indictments have caused a political crisis in Croatia because they
question the claim that the Homeland War was a progressive war of
liberation and undermine the Western powers’ claim that the Balkan
conflict was entirely the product of former Yugoslav President Slobodan
Milosevic’s drive for a Greater Serbia. The atrocities detailed in the
indictments show that the upper echelons of the Croatian military promoted
a brand of nationalism every bit as reactionary as Milosevic’s Serbian
nationalism; one that glorifies the Nazi puppet regime in Croatia during
the 1940s and speaks of regaining Western Bosnia.
The crimes committed during the Homeland War were never investigated
during the ten years that President Franjo Tudjman’s Croatian Democratic
Union (HDZ) governed Croatia after its separation from Yugoslavia.
Following threats to stop an International Monetary Fund loan, the HDZ did
pass a law on cooperation with the ICTY and handed over ten Bosnian Croats
accused of war crimes in Bosnia in 1997. However the HDZ regarded those
involved in the Homeland War as untouchable heroes.
When HDZ rule collapsed in January 2000, the Western powers claimed the
new coalition government led by Ivica Racan’s Social Democratic Party (a
successor to the former Communist Party) heralded a break with the extreme
nationalism of the Tudjman era and that it would agree to Croatian war
crimes investigations. These investigations were particularly necessary to
bolster the new and fragile pro-Western Serbian government that was faced
with a crisis over its decision to hand over Milosevic to the ICTY.
After meeting Croatian officials, ICTY Chief Prosecutor Carla del Ponte
declared, “The whole tone is different... Finally we have a partner in the
Balkans and not just another problem.”
However, the indictments caused severe difficulties in Croatia. In
2000, the HDZ organised massive demonstrations and blockaded the
Zagreb-Split highway after the indictment of General Mirko Norac for war
crimes committed in 1991. Twelve generals, including Bobetko, signed an
open letter criticising Racan’s attempts to “devalue” the Homeland War,
sparking off rumours of a coup. In July 2001, four ministers in Racan’s
government belonging to the Social Liberal Party resigned after Gotovina
and Ademi were indicted causing a vote of no confidence to be taken in the
Croatian Assembly.
By the time of her appearance at the UN Security Council last year, del
Ponte appeared exasperated. “In June 2001 ... as an expression of trust, I
gave the Croatian Government advanced notice of a sealed indictment
against General Ante Gotovina, a commander of forces who was accused of
crimes against humanity. My trust was misplaced—he was allowed to evade
arrest and according to various reliable sources he is now enjoying a safe
haven in the territory of Croatia,” she said. Del Ponte continued, “In May
this year I again provided the Croatian authorities with advanced notice
of an imminent indictment against General Bobetko, former Chief of Staff
of the Croatian Army.... Instead of compliance with the Tribunal’s order,
the Croatian Government has taken upon itself to seek to challenge the
warrant and the indictment itself. We next heard that the General’s health
does not permit his travel to The Hague. More delay and obstruction. The
attitude of Croatia is unacceptable.”
With unemployment in Croatia over 20 percent and public expenditure
more than 50 percent of GDP—the highest in Europe—the government has
speeded up the HDZ programme of privatisations, layoffs and reductions in
welfare. Croatia’s has joined the World Trade Organisation and applied for
membership of NATO and the European Union.
To head off the widespread strike action these policies are provoking
the government is playing the nationalist card. In June 2001 Racan
announced plans to erect a huge monument to the Homeland War saying “At
this time of difficult decisions and self-sacrifice ... we should remember
and be inspired by the strong unity of the Homeland War ... [when] ...
there was no left, no right, there were no political, social, cultural or
other differences.”
Racan is no stranger to the use of nationalism to divert the working
class. A former Stalinist bureaucrat like Milosevic, he was elected
president of the ruling Croatian Communist Party in 1989 and played a key
role in the break up of the Yugoslav federation. In 1990 he clashed with
Milosevic, declaring that Croatia would no longer “provide bread to
Serbia” and organised the first multi-party elections specifically to
approve his separatist line.
Racan defends the Medak Pocket attack as a “legitimate military
operation” and states that Bobetko performed his “constitutional duty to
liberate Croatian territory” and so cannot be considered guilty of
“command responsibility”. However, he is happy to accuse Milosevic of
“command responsibility” for Serbian atrocities and sanctioned Croatian
President Stipe Mesic’s appearance as a witness for the prosecution at
Milosevic’s trial. For his part, Milosevic claims the atrocities were also
individual acts of violence that occurred whilst he was trying to preserve
the Yugoslav federation and its constitution.
The case has highlighted divisions between Europe and the United
States. Recently US Ambassador for War Crimes, Pierre-Richard Prosper,
told the ICTY it should focus on the arrest of four remaining key suspects
and then halt its investigations and hand over existing cases to local
courts. Prosper said that during a visit to the Balkans he would aim to
“press” the governments in Serbia, Bosnia, and Croatia to arrest all
remaining fugitives, but he cancelled his visit to Croatia at the last
minute as a slap in the face to del Ponte and her efforts to indict the
Croatian generals.
The US has reason to be concerned at a high profile trial of the
generals. The Croatian army acted as Washington’s proxy army against
Milosevic and there is plenty of evidence that the Clinton administration
provided vital support to Croatia during Operation Storm. In his book
To End A War, Clinton’s special envoy Richard Holbrooke described
the Croat forces as his “junkyard dogs” and recounts his conversation with
the Croatian defence minister during the battle, saying, “We can’t say
this publicly but please take Sanski Most, Prijedor and Bosanki Novi. And
do it quickly before the Serbs regroup.”
The US government endorsed a contract between the Croatian army and the
US military consultancy firm Military Professional Resource Incorporated
to provide military training.
Franjo Tudjman’s son Miro, who was head of Croatian intelligence at the
time, claims the relationship went further—with the Croatian and US
governments enjoying a “de facto partnership”. He says the US provided $10
million worth of listening and intercept equipment and all “intelligence
in Croatia went on line in real time to the National Security Agency in
Washington.”
Gotovina seemed especially close to US officials, which may explain his
ability to evade capture for so long. It is alleged that US drone aircraft
operated out of his headquarters in order to spy on Yugoslav army
movements. Photographs show Gotovina with US military personnel in front
of a computer screen showing “Battle Staff Training Program” and “Welcome
to Training Center Fort Irwin”. According to Nenad Ivankovic, former army
commander and Gotovina’s biographer, Gotovina “feels betrayed by the
silence of the US today and by the people he knew. The CIA saw everything
that happened during Operation Storm and never objected then.” Washington
has refused all requests from the ICTY for documents and satellite
photographs relating to this period.
Another concern of US officials is to prevent the concept of “command
responsibility” becoming a definition for war crimes. Lawyers for the
Croat generals have pointed out that Clinton, Holbrooke and other US
officials could also be charged with command responsibility for Operation
Storm because “they knew the attack was coming and gave it the green
light.”
This threat is taken seriously. In 2002 Henry Hyde chairman of the
House Committee on International Relations warned that the ICTY could
investigate officials who were “formulating and carrying out US government
policy” for command responsibility in connection with Operation Storm.
Gotovina’s indictment was the “best example of the ICTY’s politicised and
inaccurate prosecution,” a Senate inquiry was told.
In a series of articles in September 2002, journalists in the
Washington Times repeated Hyde’s warning and attacked the concept
of command responsibility as “a threat to US national interests”. In
effect, the Times pronounced, the concept made “war itself a crime”
and illegalised the use of “overwhelming force”, that is, the foundation
of US military strategy. The Times pointed out that Operation Storm
was the model for Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, where the
Northern Alliance acted as a US proxy army. If command responsibility is
made a definition of a war crime then “the United States can be made
accountable for the actions of its allies around the world. There will be
nothing preventing the International Criminal Court from making US
officials responsible for isolated criminal acts that have been committed
by Northern Alliance troops.”
The Operation Storm indictment, the Times concluded, “threatens
to limit Washington’s ability to project its power around the world.”
See Also: Croatian
government crisis over extraditions to UN tribunal [11 July
2001] Behind the
Milosevic trial: the US, Europe and the Balkan catastrophe [4 July
2001]
Top of page
Readers: The WSWS invites your
comments. Please send
e-mail.
Copyright 1998-2003 World Socialist Web Site All rights
reserved |