HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------


http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/A
rticle_Type1&c=

Article&cid=1035778422643&call_pageid=970599119419

THE TORONTO STAR, Saturday, March 1, 2003

Why does Bush push to silence free speech?

President's obsession threatens stability around the world

RAMSEY CLARK
SPECIAL TO THE STAR

Former U.S. attorney-general Ramsey Clark met with Iraqi President
Saddam Hussein last Sunday. He wrote this commentary exclusively for the
Toronto Star.

Should a free person be afraid to meet with a demonized "brutal
dictator"?

If not, how do we hope to learn, understand, act to avoid violence and
war? If our (U.S.) government says, "You will only be deceived and used,
a dupe, if you meet," doesn't this reveal an intention to exercise
arbitrary control over information on which public opinion is formed
that might affect government plans?

Why did the White House object to the interview with President Saddam
Hussein by Dan Rather, seek to interject rebuttal and rebuke at
different points in the interview, and then complain that a person who
lies should not be allowed to speak in the media?

Because I believe in individual freedom and that the truth can set us
free, I will never accept the command "thou shalt not" reason together.

At this moment, U.S. anger over meetings with Saddam Hussein reflects
Bush administration fears that opposition voices might begin to ask,
"Who are the real aggressors, the greater threats to peace, the most
dangerous terrorists?" Once a person is able to hear all sides and is
informed, the answers cannot be controlled by government propaganda.

During the barely two years of his presidency, George W. Bush has
revealed an unprecedented, uncompromising obsession for war that
threatens peace and economic stability around the world.

He is the head of government of the sole superpower on earth. Its
military is capable of destroying any nation without ever setting foot
on it and,

incredibly, President Bush has threatened to use nuclear weapons.

The U.S. has less than six per cent of the world's population, with vast

wealth concentrated in corporate control and personal fortunes that have

created the greatest - and growing - gap between rich and poor, and
economic policies that contribute to the same growing gap worldwide.

Bush proclaimed the right and initiated a war of aggression against
Afghanistan, causing thousands of deaths, many civilian, and installing
a government of his choice in Kabul.

He has authorized daily military flights over Iraq which have resulted
in frequent, and in the last few months, daily aerial assaults that have
killed hundreds of people in Iraq without a single U.S. plane being hit
or seriously at risk.

He has proclaimed his intention of "regime change" by military force in
Iraq with an unavoidable consequence of thousands of civilian deaths.
U.S. regime changes in the past brought to power the Shah of Iran,
Mobutu in the Congo, Pinochet in Chile and dozens of other repressive
governments subservient to U.S. interests and power.

Reverberations from President Bush's bellicosity threatening war, even
nuclear assaults, have been heard from India, Pakistan, North Korea ...
Colombia, the Philippines and occupied Palestine.

If Bush's promise to make Iraq a paradise of democracy, "liberty plus
groceries." as the Depression-era Texan congressman Maury Maverick
defined it, ask how the people of North Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama,
Haiti, Somalia, Sudan and Afghanistan fared after direct U.S.
interventions in the last half-century.

President Bush has authorized and approved assassinations, summary
executions and murders - and boasted of them, in his State of the Union
message in January. "All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have

been arrested in many countries, and many others have met a different
fate ... let's put it this way, they are no longer a problem for the
United States and our friends and allies."

He has authorized and condoned bribery, coercion and retaliation to
obtain his war ends.

Fundamental human rights and civil liberties protected by international
law and the U.S. Constitution have been violated within the United
States against both citizens and aliens and abroad by illegal arrests,
secret detentions, false criminal charges, and interference with rights
to assemble, protest and speak.

He has drastically undermined U.N. authority, threatening it with
irrelevancy, coercing it to follow his command and acting independently
and in defiance of the U.N. Charter.

For Iraq, Bush has authorized a plan of attack called "Shock and Awe," a

massive aerial and missile assault in the first hours and days against a

defenceless people. Any one of the 300 to 400 cruise missiles, which
will strike Iraq the first day, is far deadlier than all the alleged
excessive-range missiles - (with ranges) less than 200 kilometres - that

Saddam has been ordered to destroy.

The world has been told "There will not be a safe place in Baghdad ...
The sheer size of this has never been seen before, never been
contemplated before."

How are the people of the world to accept these threats? Are they
terrorism as prelude to genocide?

President Saddam Hussein told Dan Rather, "We will die in Iraq."

If death is by U.S. violence, what will come after?


International human rights activist Ramsey Clark was U.S.
attorney-general from 1967-69 under president Lyndon Johnson.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bdn7KI.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^================================================================

Reply via email to