The world in its pre-technological state though not an intelligence is basically unFriendly. It is not out to get you, but you can die in this world from all sorts of causes, like not getting oxygen. However, because we evolved in the world, we are in the amazingly improbable state of usually being able to survive for a few decades in this unFriendly environment.
Taking into account the world's technology, as you do in this email, the world is much Friendlier, since the technology was developed to achieve human goals, i.e. usually your goals. You live longer and get more of what you want. As it improves, this will be more and more true unless a weapon-like technology helps a user achieve his human goals, but too effectively, thus overriding your goals or a technology stops helping us achieve our goals because of a bug or mistake, e.g., out-of-control nanotch. The world's technology is still not intelligent, but it does incorporate human intelligence. It is "indifferent" as you mention, since it does not have a personality, but a superAGI might also not have a personality as we understand it. As long as the technology helps us with your goals, we'd have to call it Friendly. Joshua 2007/7/14, Stathis Papaioannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Despite the fact that it seems to lack a single unified consciousness the world of humans and their devices behaves as if it is both vastly more intelligent and vastly more powerful than any unassisted individual human. If you could build a machine that ran a planet all by itself just as well as 6.7 billion people can, doing all the things that people do as fast as people do them, then that would have to qualify as a superintelligent AI even if you can envisage that with a little tweaking it could be truly godlike. The same considerations apply to me in relation to the world as apply to an ant relative to a human or to humanity relative to a vastly greater AI (vastly greater than humanity, not just vastly greater than a human). If the world decided to crush me there is nothing I could do about it, no matter how strong or fast or smart I am. As it happens, the world is mostly indifferent to me and some parts of it will destroy me instantly if I get in their way: if I walk into traffic only a few metres from where I am sitting. But even if it wanted to help me there could be problems: if the world decided it wanted to cater to my every command I might request paperclips and it might set about turning everything into paperclip factories, or if it wanted to make me happy it might forcibly implant electrodes in my brain. And yet, I feel quite safe living with this very powerful, very intelligent, potentially very dangerous entity all around me. Should I worry more as the world's population and technological capabilities increase further, rendering me even weaker and more insignificant in comparison? -- Stathis Papaioannou ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=22307053-3fd9f2
