http://video.google.fr/videoplay?docid=351403092360854662
----- Message d'origine ---- De : Kaj Sotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : [email protected] Envoyé le : Samedi, 29 Décembre 2007, 23h50mn 04s Objet : Re: [singularity] Requested: objections to SIAI, AGI, the Singularity and Friendliness On 12/29/07, Charles D Hixson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, it could be that in any environment there is an optimal level of > intelligence, and that possessing more doesn't yield dramatically > improved results, but does yield higher costs. This is, of course, > presuming that intelligence is a unitary kind of thing, which I doubt, > but a more sophisticated argument along the same lines could argue that > there is an optimum in each dimension of intelligence. We have an objection of basically that type, but the wording could be improved. Thanks. By the way, http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/tom/?p=83 has a more recent list of the objections so far. -- http://www.saunalahti.fi/~tspro1/ | http://xuenay.livejournal.com/ Organizations worth your time: http://www.singinst.org/ | http://www.crnano.org/ | http://lifeboat.com/ ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&; _____________________________________________________________________________ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail http://mail.yahoo.fr ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=80295484-3ee460
