On 27 Oct 2009, at 02:37, Stephane Corlosquet wrote:
> Hi, > > I talked to John about this a couple of times and never ended up > sending an email about it. sioc:name is redundant with foaf:name and > does not really provide its own semantics compared to foaf:name. Why > do we need it? Indeed, not sure if much needed, and both are datatype properties with an open domain. However, I'd then simply use rdfs:label rather than foaf:name Alex. > > Steph. > > > -- Dr. Alexandre Passant Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> . --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIOC-Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
