Olivier Berger wrote: > We've had to fix quite a few bugs, as it seems it had been a long time > no one had checked the XHTML strict validity of the FusionForge pages.
Validity (as in DTD) is not as important as well-formedness. Most parsers don't care about DTDs, but may care a lot about tags being closed, attributes being quoted etc. Also, the W3C validator tends to output many messages that are caused by few actual issues. For example, I was able to make https://forge.projet-coclico.org/projects/website/ well-formed, valid and parseable by RDFLib just by putting quotes around the href attribute value on line 260. > Yes, I'm still working on the specs of the ontology so it will come > soon. Is it the same thing as the Forge ontology[1]? [1] https://forge.projet-coclico.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/wp2/index.php/Forge_Ontology_Proposal -- Vasiliy Faronov -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIOC-Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to sioc-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sioc-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en.
