Hi,

Your 180 ringing should not have that extra Via except the
original one in INVITE when it received on originated side.-:( may be typo..
error..):-

Comming to your question..

For dialog matching the call-id must be matched, as it is an mandatory part
of any dilaog id as per rfc 3261. 

In rfc 2543 there is no transaction. If call-id dosen't match for any
call-legs, then 
necessary error handling (sending 481 response) should be taken care
immidiately. 
So I don't think there is a need of repeated checking. 

regards,
-Arun

-----Original Message-----
From: Nataraju A.B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:47 AM
To: SIP Implementors
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query about DIALOG match..


Hi,

In case of 3261 compliant statck dialog match is mandatory to have call-Id
match or will this be OK if the transaction matches.

the messages which I used are as follows..

INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5063 SIP/2.0
From: BigGuy <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061>;tag=9fxced76sl
To: LittleGuy <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5063>
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.2.61:5061;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9
Max-Forwards: 66
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061;transport=udp>
Content-Length: 0


SIP/2.0 180 RINGING
From: BigGuy <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061>;tag=9fxced76sl
To: LittleGuy <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5063>
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.2.61:5060;branch=z9hG4bK390cf6ad2
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.2.61:5061;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9
Record-Route: <sip:10.18.2.61:5060;ttl=0;X-HwCsfCookie=1>
Max-Forwards: 65
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061;transport=udp>
Content-Length: 0

the two messages differ in Call-Id.

In this case shall I consider Dlg match as a full match since branch Id
match happens or should be considered as No-Match...

{{

The two options left out are as follows

If we have call-Id match Then that lead repeated check on call-Id in case of
2543 compliant messages. because call-Id match is part transaction match
itself.
Or
else we need to do this conditionally for 3261 compliant mesages (for this
branch Id check for magic cookie need to be done @ dialog level)

}}

Any responses will be appreciated...

Regards,
-------------------------------------------
Nataraju A.B.
Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.,
Tel : +91-98455-95744
-------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to