I'm looking at the "Server" and "User-Agent" headers and I see a conflict with the "comment" fields (in the BNF). Say you had: "Server: Virtual Phone (Demo) v1.1". This should parse into 3 "server-val" fields (product comment product) with a single space of "LWS" between each field. However, because "comment" allows "SWS" before and after the "(" and ")" the space after "(Demo)" will get included with the comment. The parser is trying to find "LWS SWS(...)SWS LWS" which causes issues. Should comments allow "SWS" before the first "(" and after the last ")"? Is this a know bug? Or should "LWS" in the header actually be "COMMA"?
Thanks,
Chris McKinnon
_______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
