----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Is "lr=on" a correct syntax for the lr-param?

At 09:31 PM 10/6/2003, Ganesh Jayadevan wrote:
>Jiri,
>
>I have two points to make (one for and one against):
>
>1. Where do we draw the line? Under the liberal guideline, should we let anything pass?
>     I would say if the parser did not die but rejected the message gracefully, then the rule has been
>     applied. The difficulty comes in attaching semantics to the parameter values (as somebody
>     else pointed out).

I didn't ask for value processing. With RR, I suggested parameter-presence test
for lr.

>   The goal of interop should be the verification of the standard. If the standard is broken, we then
>     lobby to fix it. I don't think we should be bending rules motivated by interoperability.
>2. If this helps any, should there be a rule that says all parameters will be in the form of
>    n-v pairs? Might help parsing be more generic and less context sensitive.

If we rebuilt SIP, I would advocate less syntactical choices for a single thing --
no doubt they make parser more complex -> more error-prone and slower. However,
with amount of SIP deployed today, reformulating the syntax would quite likely
cause more headache than benefits.
[ABN] At some point of time the earlier implementations did some mistake ( unknowingly ). to handle those mistakes we need to make the new implementations to be so generic may not a good idea.  there should be some point of deviation to be tolerated, beyond which we can't make handle only those bugs to be fixed in the earlier implementations.  
 
Yes, I do agree with the idea of robustness & to be interoperable with old versions. but if we find that understanding itself was wrong then at some point of time it must be fixed. we just can't handle this problem by just making the new implementations to handle the old discrepancies also.
 
This might lead to major problem in maintaining the system at later point of time ( because of various deviations from normal syntax ).
 
-jiri

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
 
Regards,
-------------------------------------------
Nataraju A.B.
Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.,
Tel : +91-98455-95744
-------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to