Lavis,
IMO this has to be considered parameter duplication, and hence an error.
Paul
Lavis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If someone know that the following header is valid in SIP syntax or not?
>
> <Quote>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pc33.atlanta.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8;branch
> </Quote>
>
> Here if we can think the first branch is the Via branch parameter,
> and the second branch is a generic parameter as a extension? or we
> should think the second branch is the duplication of the first branch?
>
> More generally, if the same token can represent as a well-known
> parameters name and a generic parameter name? or we should think this is
> a parameter duplication and reject the message?
>
> Regards,
> Lavis
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
