Hi, If you want to include parameters in the user-part I believe that the rules for a TEL-URL apply.
Regards, Christer Holmberg Ericsson Finland > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Brett Tate > Sent: 1. syyskuuta 2004 3:12 > To: 'Kasammiya Patil'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Request URI question > > > > While composing request uri for INVITE, > > where there is no user portion but there > > is a user-info parameter such as cic, > > how is request uri encoded ? > > I am not aware of a draft or RFC which > allows it. > > > Do we need to include a ; before the > > user-info parameter ? From the start > > lines below, which one is correct ? > > > > INVITE sip:;[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 > > > > OR > > > > INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 > > > > I think that both are syntactically > correct. I am not aware of any draft > or rfc that would indicate the explicit > intention that you are desiring. However > if pstngateway receives the message > and knows how user-info gets allocated, > both can be legal. If you are trying to > apply an RFC 2806 extension or bis, I don't > think that either conform. > > The following is an RFC 2806 extension > defining cic. > > http://www.softarmor.com/iptel/drafts/draft-yu-tel-url-07.txt > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
