Comments inline...

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tamar
Barzuza
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 7:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] lr parameter in non-sip record-route

Hi,
1. Is it correct to assume that a sip proxy will always put record-route
headers with sip or sips uri?
[Nataraju A.B.] No, it's conditional depending on the configuration and
the purpose with which the proxy been used....

2. Before forwarding the message according to the next route header, a
proxy must determine whether the next proxy is a strict router. It
therefore searches for 'lr' in this route header. What should the proxy
do if the next route header has non-sip uri (tel, in, etc.)? Can non-sip
uris contain the lr parameter, and would it have the same meaning as in
sip or sips uris? Can the proxy skip the search for lr when the uri is
non-sip uri (for example if the answer to 1 is yes)?
[Nataraju A.B.]  Logically speaking even non-sip uri's can have lr
parameter (see into their ABNF format) and we need to handle like what
we do for SIP-uri's...

I am not very sure the scenario where we can think of non-sip uri
carrying lr parameter...

Thanks,
Tamar.



_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors



Confidentiality Notice

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this 
message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged 
information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to