Hi
 
In SIP RFC 3261 its mentioned about the time , and it tells how long a proxy 
should wait after a Provisional 1xx response and more over it also tells that 
time can be implementations specific.
 
regds
Sumit Jayaswal.
 
 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send Sip-implementors mailing list submissions to
[email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Sip-implementors digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. RE: Timer after ringing (Mariano-Julio Stokle)
2. Re: Timer after ringing (Poojan Tanna)
3. Re: Status checking between IP Phones and a proxyserver
(Poojan Tanna)
4. sip + umts network (anne-marie boustany)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:18:50 -0500
From: "Mariano-Julio Stokle" 
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Timer after ringing
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain

Yes, it is implementation specific. F.i. you could let users to determine it
or just the admin.

Mariano Stokle
Marketing Manager - Enterprise Networks
Larrea 1079 (C1117ABE) Buenos Aires
Argentina
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T +54 (11) 4827-7237
F +54 (11) 4827-7203 mailbox 7237#




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Timer after ringing


Hi, all 
How much time should the proxy server have after getting 180 RINGING
method from an IP phone ?

>From the "draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-07, 2.9 Call Forwarding -
No Answer", it's saying " /* B1 ring until a configuration timer expires in
the Proxy. The Proxy sends Cancel and proceeds down the list of routes. */".

I could not find what would be the "configuration timer". Is that just
implementation specific ?

Thanks,
Jun
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:43:03 -0800
From: Poojan Tanna 

Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Timer after ringing
To: Hyoungjoon Park 
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi,

Ringing time basically equals to Timer B with a value of 64*T1 seconds
till the transaction times out. The default value of T1 is 500 msec so
IP Phone can ring for 32 sec.

There are two way to control the ringing time:
1. Either you increase/decrease the T1 value provided that the value is
configurable.
2. Have a new propriety 'ringing timer' on the box and keep it
configurable. After receiving 180/183 response, the new 'ringing timer'
will start and will allow IP Phone to ring till the configured value.

The second method is more desirable because changing the T1 value has
other repercussions as Timer A also uses T1 value.

Thanks,
Poojan.




Hyoungjoon Park wrote:
> 
> Hi, all
> How much time should the proxy server have after getting 180 RINGING
> method from an IP phone ?
> 
> From the "draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-07, 2.9 Call Forwarding -
> No Answer", it's saying " /* B1 ring until a configuration timer expires in
> the Proxy. The Proxy sends Cancel and proceeds down the list of routes. */".
> 
> I could not find what would be the "configuration timer". Is that just
> implementation specific ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jun
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Poojan Tanna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone Office : 510-747-5282 
Home : 510-569-8820
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:52:13 -0800
From: Poojan Tanna 

Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Status checking between IP Phones and
a proxyserver
To: Hyoungjoon Park 
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi,

I think SIP Session Timer answers your question. 

The SIP Session Timer draft is available at the following location:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-session-timer-15.txt

Session Timer will include one entity playing the role of Refresher and
another Refreshee. The Refresher will keep sending the refresh re-Invite
request to the Refreshee depending upon the configured/negotiated time
once the call is UP. Thus if Refreshee does not receive the re-Invite
till the Session Timer expires then it bring down the call.

Thanks,
Poojan.


Hyoungjoon Park wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have some questions about checking status of IP phone.
> 
> I wonder if there's any way to keep tracking of the IP phone's status.
> In case when one of phones might be power-off or transport links beetween
> phones and the proxy server got disconnected, the server could not figure
> out the status of phones.
> Knowing of the status of phone - especially dialog status - would be
> very important in terms of "call logging or accunting".
> 
> I've considered using Subscribe/Notify methods but I'm not sure what
> would be the practical solution for this.
> Do I have to use some kinds of proprietary messages such as a Skinny
> from Cisco ?
> 
> Thanks
> Jun
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Poojan Tanna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone Office : 510-747-5282 
Home : 510-569-8820
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:34:28 +0000
From: "anne-marie boustany" 
Subject: [Sip-implementors] sip + umts network
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/attachments/20050128/652b8bc2/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors


End of Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 22, Issue 27
************************************************



                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to