Hi, I think the difference is that you are not going to establish multiple dialogs, no matter to how many different locations you send the re-INVITE.
Regards, Christer Holmberg Ericsson Finland > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Brett Tate > Sent: 22. helmikuuta 2005 20:29 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] "re-invite" > > > > Is it correct to call it "forking", when > > a re-INVITE is sent to alternative > > IP addresses resolved from the DNS? > > Thanks. I agree that the situation does not exactly match RFC3261's > "forking" definition. And I shall try to refrain from > calling it "forking > within a dialog". As long as RFC3261 and RFC3263 permit it, > I don't care > what it is called. :) > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
