Retesh inline Regards Ranjit
_____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chadha Retesh-A19894 Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:56 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Sip] question rgding call hold I have a query regarding call hold. I am not really sure if this is already discussed, but wanted an advice from the experts here. Is the following call flow acceptable?? Make Call Invite --> 200 ok <-- ACK --> Hold ---> INVITE(sendonly) --> 200 ok(recvonly) <--- ACK --> INVITE(sendrecv) <--- ?????? [Ranjit] INVITE (sendrecv) ---> The UA that is on hold cannot send INVITE for resume What should be the response to this INVITE request - 200ok with sendonly or 400 bad request? Wont this INVITE mean, that the remote is trying to release local hold, which is unacceptable? Also, i have not seen any rules regarding this in RFC 3261 or the sipping examples draft. Please redirect me to any other references, which talk about attribute modes in subsequent requests after call hold. Thanks in advance Retesh _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
