> > URIs in To and From headers are not allowed 
> > to contain a port number.
> 
> That looks like a typo to me!  They're the only 
> URIs not allowed to contain a port number, and 
> the grammar of section 25 allows port numbers.

It isn't a typo; it was intentionally removed.  Since the modification is
not backwards compatible with RFC2543, I don't recommend it trigging a 400
response.

If I recall correctly, the reason for the removal was that the port was not
considered to be part of the user/device identity.


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to