Hi,

As per sec 14.1 of RFC3261, both of these are valid scenarios. This says, in
context of re-INVITE SDP, that - "It is important to note that the full
description of the session, not just the change, is sent."

Absence of SDP in re-INVITE means that it's a re-INVITE without an offer, in
which case first reliable response to it will contain an offer and usual
offer/answer process will follow.

Regards,

Neeraj Jain
BayPackets Technologies

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Banibrata
Dutta
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 5:30 PM
To: 'Banibrata Dutta'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] session refresh, but without SDP ?

Additional info:

NOTE: Here the "UAS" is the refresher.

A                B
---INVITE(sdp)---> : M1 
<--200 OK--------- : M2
---ACK-----------> : M3
      ...
<--INVITE()------- : M4
case1:
---200 OK(sdp)---> : M5
case2:
---200 OK--------> : M5'

Is the case1 the valid scenario in case of session refresh, i.e. M5 contains
same "sdp" as M1 ?
or, is the case2 a valid scenarios ?

- bdutta

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Banibrata
Dutta
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 4:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] session refresh, but without SDP ?

Hi,

Does absence of body (SDP) in the re-INVITE used to do session-refresh (in
case of Session-Timers), signify that media properties remain unchanged from
the previously negotiated ones, or does it mean, no media, i.e. any
established RTP sessions are to be torn down, if re-INVITE doesn't contain
body ?

thanks & regards,
bdutta


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to