So there is no standard which says what should be done in this case? Nataraju A B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Comments inline...
Thanks & Regards, Nataraju A.B. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Litty Preeth Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 1:16 PM To: SIP Implementors Subject: [Sip-implementors] Contact q value Hi, Thanks for the response of previous ques... My next question is about the q value of the Contact header. Which contact should i be giving more priority, one with a q value or the one without it. I meant, shall i assign a default q value suppose 0.8 for all the contacts without q values and then sort them accordingly or i sort the contacts with q value first and then consider the ones without priorities assigned as having least priority. [ABN] it's my personal opinion about the usage of q parameter... You can consider ones with q parameters should sorted first and then followed by contacts without q parameters (would be of least priority ones)... With Regards, Litty Preeth --------------------------------- Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors --------------------------------- Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
