Here's another scenario where holding a held call might be nice... 1) A and B are in a call. 2) B puts call on hold. 3) C calls A. 4) A wants to hold call with B so they can answer call from C.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dale R. Worley Sent: 29 November 2005 15:01 To: Sip-Implementors Subject: Re: R: Re: [Sip-implementors] Avoiding call on hold > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > One reason could be that I don't want to give the chance to start a > > transfer > > call from both of them.(A transfer B to C and B transfer A to D...what a > > funny thing to have C and D talk together..). It is not strange at all; it is what one would expect -- A replaces himself with C, and B replaces himself with D, thus resulting in C talking to D. And this is not peculiar in the real world. Suppose A calls B, and B says "Please wait, I want to go to another phone, I will transfer the call to phone D." And then A says "Yes, I would like to move myself to phone C. I will transfer my end of the call to C. We will talk when we are both at the new phones." Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
