Hi,
I have a question regarding the interpretation of ‘duration’ attribute
value in 'time’ node as mentioned in RFC 3880 (CPL).
RFC 3880 - Section 4.4 - Time Switches
"For a recurring interval, the "duration" parameter MUST be small
enough such that subsequent intervals do not overlap."
In the RFC, there is no further discussion on this statement. Please let me
know which of the
following interpretation is correct.
1) 'duration' must be smaller than the 'freq * interval' value (byxxx is
not considered)
<time dtstart="20050301T093000" duration="P700D" freq="yearly" interval="2"
bymonth="3,4">
Here 'duration' value should be smaller than (365 * 2 days)
2) 'duration' must be smaller than the minimum unit (taking byxxx into
consideration)
<time dtstart="20050301T093000" duration="P28D" freq="yearly" interval="2"
bymonth="3,4">
Here 'duration' value should be smaller than 28 days (maximum difference
between bymonth attribute values - assuming a month difference = 28 days)
Regards,
Prashant
*********************** FSS-Private ***********************
"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Flextronics Software Systems
(FSS) and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and
should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is
intended. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or
disclosing the contents of this message. FSS accepts no responsibility for
loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this
email including damage from virus."
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
