to add more,
  because endpoint has nothing to do with Record-route header.
  
  regards
  theja

Atul kumar Jha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:              v\:* 
{behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* 
{behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}        
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }                     
    Hi Peter,
     
    In your example, Record-Route header is  getting reverted in the response.
    But as we go by section 16.12.1.1 of RFC  3261 and section 3.2 of the RFC 
3665 (see the F12 message) we should maintain  the same order of Record-Route 
in the response. 
    It should not be reverted in the response.  
    It should be same as you got in your INVITE.  
     
    Regards,
    Atul
     
     
            
---------------------------------
    
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marqui  
Peter-E50322
  Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006  11:21 PM
  To: Rayees Khan
  Cc: [email protected];  [email protected]
  Subject: RE: [Sip] Record-Route
    
     
    Hi Rayees,
     
    I'm not sure I follow you 
        Do you mean my example is correct or that the Record-Route  sent in the 
response is exactly what was received by the callee in the  INVITE request ?
    
        It is not built as the response traversew  the path from U2 to U1
    
        
   
    
        
---------------------------------
    
    From: Rayees  Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006  11:32 AM
  To: Marqui Peter-E50322
  Cc:  [email protected]; [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [Sip] Record-Route
        Hi Peter,
  
  If we go by Section 16.12.1.1 of RFC 3261 the Record-Route stack of response  
seems to be inverted. The record-route stack in response is maintained as it is 
 build along traversal of request.
  
  
  regards
  Rayees
  
  
  
  
    
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: -----
    To:  <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
  From: "Marqui Peter-E50322" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: 02/16/2006 05:20PM
  Subject: [Sip] Record-Route
        Should the Record-Route fields between the calling and  called party be 
symmetrical ? 
    
        Or the same for each direction ? 
    
            U1->P1->P2->P3->P4->U2
    
        The INVITE arriving at U2 contains: 
    
              INVITE  sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
        Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Record-Route: <sip:p4.domain.com;lr>
        Record-Route: <sip:p3.middle.com>
        Record-Route: <sip:p2.example.com;lr>
        Record-Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> 
    
        While subsequent messages arriving at U1 from U2 would take  the 
following path:      U2->P4->P3->P2->P1>U1  
    
        And the Record-Route header would be as follows 
    
              SIP/2.0 200 OK 
    
              Contact:  sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Record-Route: <sip:p1.example.com;lr> 
    
              Record-Route:  <sip:p2.example.com;lr>
        Record-Route: <sip:p3.middle.com>
        Record-Route: <sip:p4.domain.com;lr>
    
    Peter Marqui 
    Motorola MDB, Libertyville 
    Email:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    Phone:  847-523-0584 
    Mobile:  847- 
    _______________________________________________
  Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
  This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
  Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
  Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
    
  
  *****FSS-Private *****" DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to  
Flextronics Software Systems Limited (FSS) and is intended solely for the use  
of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or  
confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose  
other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, 
 please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended  
recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using,  
copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. FSS accepts no  
responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information  
transmitted by this email including damage from virus."
    
    _______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

                                
---------------------------------
 Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to